Exhibit 2
Hydro customers likely to see worst rate increase 12/18/2000
By Deborah Turcotte Seavey, Of the NEWS Staff

BANGOR — The electricity users most likely to be hit hardest by a Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission ruling last week could be those in the
transmission area of Bangor Hydro-Electric Co.

FERC’s ruling is expected to have a widespread impact on power rates
throughout Maine, with customers likely to shell out millions of additional
dollars.

Most of that money, though, could come from residential, commercial and
industrial consumers in Bangor Hydro’s service territory whose power rates
aren’t protected in long-term contracts signed with the state.

Bangor Hydro residential consumers already are paying the most in the state
for standard offer electricity service at 6.1 cents per kilowatt-hour.
Another increase of possibly up to 2 cents would put prices at nearly double
what standard offer users are paying in the service territories of Central
Maine Power Co. and Maine Public Service Co.

The standard offer electricity rate for residential consumers in CMP’s
territory is set at about 4.1 cents per kilowatt-hour through Feb. 28, 2002,
and cannot be changed because of FERC’s ruling, said Tom Welch, chairman of
the Maine Public Utilities Commission. Neither can the standard offer
electricity rate for residential, commercial and industrial users in MPS’
service territory. There, residential users pay 4.29 cents per kilowatt-hour
through Feb. 28, 2001.

Standard offer is a default electricity rate — and not the transmission rate
— charged to residential, commercial or industrial power consumers who have
not chosen another company to sell them electricity.

Under the state’s restructuring of the electric industry, Maine’s three
utilities no longer generate power only transmit it.

Power suppliers bid to be the sellers of standard offer electricity, and the
PUC evaluates the bids and sets the rates for the three customer
classifications in the state’s three service territories.

The PUC liked the rates for residential users in CMP’s territory, and for
residential, commercial and industrial users in MPS’ territory. The
commission said the rates were in line with what consumers were paying before
electric industry restructuring started on March 1.

But the standard offer bids from power suppliers for all customer classes in
Bangor Hydro’s territory came in too high. So did the bids for commercial and
industrial users in CMP’s territory.

The PUC, then, set the standard offer rate for those customers and told
Bangor Hydro and CMP to go out and buy power to meet the demand for standard
offer electricity. The utilities were instructed to provide standard offer
through Feb. 28, 2001.

But price volatility in the energy marketplace has affected the price Bangor
Hydro must pay for electricity to meet its standard offer obligations.

A couple months ago, Bangor Hydro was forced to ask for more money through
rates to cover its costs of buying power from wholesale suppliers.

Now with FERC’s ruling, both Bangor Hydro and CMP either are asking for rate
increases or evaluating whether to petition for rate increases to cover extra
costs from their wholesale suppliers.

CMP late last week filed a request for standard offer rate increases with the
PUC, saying it will be charged an additional almost $12 million from their
suppliers that face penalties under FERC’s ruling.

Bangor Hydro hasn’t made a decision on whether to do so, said company vice
president Carroll lee.

Last week, FERC set a penalty to be charged to power suppliers who do not
meet a requirement to have in place all the electricity they are obligated to
send over the grid daily plus extra in case it is needed during peak demand
periods.

For most Maine ratepayers, FERC’s decision translates into an additional 2
cents per kilowatt-hour for electricity only, Welch said. Transmission rates
are fixed and are not affected by the ruling.

The 2-cent increase remains an arbitrary number, and has not been approved as
an actual increase by the PUC nor has it been factored into rates yet, he said.

Power users’ bills are broken down into three parts: the electricity supply
rate, which could be the standard offer charge or another amount charged by a
consumer-selected supplier; the transmission rate; and the distribution rate.

Any increases are applied to the electricity supply rate, and not the
transmission and distribution charges, which are fixed. Bangor Hydro’s
transmission and distribution rate is set at about 9.4 cents per
kilowatt-hour and is not affected by FERC’s decision.

Consumers can choose to buy their electricity from other power suppliers that
might offer better rates, Welch said.

If a standard offer electricity rate increase is approved for the Bangor
Hydro service territory, it would be another in a series of increases that
already have gone into effect or will be soon.

ä In August, Bangor Hydro, facing higher costs to purchase the standard offer
electricity, asked the PUC for an increase to cover its expenses. Electricity
supply rates went up, from about 4.6 cents to about 6.1 cents per
kilowatt-hour. The increase added $7.5o per month to residential users’ bill
based on usage of 500 kilowatt-hours.

ä Because of FERC’s ruling, Bangor Hydro could petition the PUC to change the
current standard offer rate of 6.1 cents per kilowatt-hour to cover the cost
of penalties the suppliers probably will pass along to the company.

If the rate were to go up 2 cents, to 8.1 cents, residential standard offer
users would pay $10 more per month.

ä Earlier last week, before FERC’s ruling, the PUC announced that it had
tentatively chosen power suppliers to sell standard offer electricity to
residential, commercial and industrial users in Bangor Hydro’s territory. The
rate would go into effect on March 1.

The PUC would not release the rate until a contract with the supplier is
completed, but it is expected to be higher because of current market
conditions. So far Bangor Hydro hasn’t decided whether to ask for an increase, Lee said.

“As far was we’re concerned, we haven’t decided whether to do anything at
this point,” Lee said. “We’re aggressively opposing [FERC’s decision]. It’s
just outrageous. If we go back to Augusta, there’s going to be some extra
costs for us if this holds. It’s probably going to be awhile before that
happens. People are going to be reluctant to make these payments seeing it’s
still in dispute.”